After finishing the Wrestling Observer Newsletter’s yearly Hall of Fame issue, I can’t help but feel that this year’s small amount of inductions (Paco Alonzo and Martin Karadagian) are a sign of things to come in the future years of the hall. It seems that the bar is being slightly raised each year for wrestlers, where a 1996 induction (like Vader for instance) would have a hard time making it in now. Thus, the only two entering the hall are there because of their business prowess. Although one can argue that all legitimate histories of professional wrestling are marginalized in one way or another, the induction of Martin Karadagian represented the WON’s most obscure and fascinating one to date. I felt that it was one of the most interesting reads of all the hall of fame bios throughout the years and I can’t see anyone finishing it without conceding that Karadagian diserves to be in the hall and probably should have been voted in much sooner. In a lackluster year for inductions, Karadagian’s bio helped this year’s issue stay on par with ones from the past. Most of the credit should probably go to Kurt Brown and Steve Sims who helped recover a history (for the U.S. readers at least) that diverts from the dominance of US, Japan, and Mexico in even the most comprehensive accounts of the business. Now I want to dig up all the footage and gimmicks from Titanes en el Ring that I can find.
This year was the closest that Fabulous Moolah came to being inducted. In the future, I really hope that she stays below the 60% needed to be voted in. A monopoly does not constitute a legacy. Also in the upper echelon were the Midnight Express, Jesse Ventura, Carlos Colon, and perennial borderline pick Dick Murdoch. This could have been the easiest year for any of these five to be inducted, but it seems that voters want to stick to a high standard that is increasing every year. Sasaki Kensuke may very well be the last active Japanese worker with a chance to be inducted, yet was 23 votes shy of induction. Yes, Japanese wrestling isn't drawing well right now and may never will again. But, Sasaki was a name throughout a boom period for New Japan, headlined several Tokyo Dome shows, has been voted MVP in the puroresu magazines, and still is one of the few bona-fide draws left in Japan. Still, there is a great chance that Sasaki will never be voted in. Thus, any of the current young stars (Tanahashi, Nakamura, Morishima) probably have no chance at all in the future. This may also be a trend in other regions as well. If voters keep to a standard that worked until the late-90s, but really is obsolete now, does any worker from this era have a chance? Career longitivity and drawing power are entirely different standards now. I’m not saying that the Cenas, Batistas, or Tanahashis deserve a place in the hall (they obviously do not right now), but Rey Misterio does. And it's a shame that he isn’t in there already.
My 2008 ballot (if I was given a chance to vote):
1) Rey Misterio – if we use the example of Dynamite Kid, then Misterio is a no-brainer. Misterio is a bigger draw than Dynamite Kid was and his work is arguably on par with Dynamite. Although, Tom Billington helped revolutionize the business in Japan with his series with Tiger Mask, the same could be said of Misterio’s work in the late-90s.
2) Sting – I still don’t understand why he gets so few votes every year. He was one of the top babyfaces in the US for years and was a decent worker. Although in the early-90s there was a question of his ability to draw, can Sting really be wholly blamed for WCW’s small crowds during that era. What I think it comes down to is that during the hottest period in the modern era, with WWF and WCW competing for supremacy, Sting drew WCW’s highest ppv buyrate and was the focus of the company’s biggest angle.
3) Dick Murdoch
4) Paco Alonso
5) Kenuske Sasaki
Btw, I would have voted ‘yes’ to remove Chris Benoit from the WON hall of fame. If this hall should be on par with others, a double murderer cannot be in it. That said, with Chris Benoit still in the hall of fame (as he received less than the 60% of the vote to remove him) – I see no justification for not voting Carlos Colon in.
Thursday, September 4, 2008
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
3 comments:
I don't think Mysterio should be in - Mexico aside he isn't a draw - ratings spiked a bit while he was champ but he's never been a national draw (except in areas w/ high Latino populations). I don't know if he revolutionized a style (Lucha)...I think he gave that style a "face" for people in the US.
I Sasaki gets a rap of being a middle of the road guy that is pushed as a main eventer. In my eyes he is below the stars of that time ( Misawa, Kawada, Kobashi,,,Muto,Hashimoto,Chono, Fujimani, Hase).
I guess in my eyes what weighs more is drawing power...followed by work rate...but if fans don't come to see you ( because in the end that's the name of the game) its harder for me to cast my vote.
Benoit on the other hand should still be in the WON Hall. He is in for his work in the ring and in the locker room. He is in because he beat all the odds of being who he is.
Did he put a huge black mark on his career?...yes.
Is he an absolute monster who should be looked down upon when reading the list of inductees?...yes
But he was voted in for a reason...being one of the best pro wrestlers ever. That can't be taken away.
I disagree about Misterio, I think he is one of WWE's biggest draws and the main reason for their increasing youth audience. Also, few (if any) others could flourish in the US wrestling scene being just a few inches over five foot. If the Dynamite Kid comparison doesn't gel with you - how about Ultimo Dragon who was inducted in 2004?
Your bit on Sasaki probably summarizes what most voters feel about him, but they are also disregarding the last seven years of his career. He was shoved down the fans throats for the first portion of his career. However, after 2001 that was not the case (I see this begining with his Dome main event with Kawada). He is still one of the only true 'stars' that can still go. Again, Hase was voted in (which I was for) and he spent most of his career in the mid-cards and his drawing ability could be questioned.
The reasons for my opinion about the Benoit situation is that the idea of pro wrestling hall of fame is laughable to most sports fans. So I think that for credibility issues, the WON hall should adopt the standards of other halls. If Mike Schmidt ends up commiting a murder, I think he would voted outof the baseball hall.
So what is your feeling on the Midnight Express. they were close this year.
Valid points on Ultimo vs. Dynamite vs Mysterio- he is a favorite of mine but is he Hall worthy? Is Zero-Max enough? His work is outstanding and he did have a decent run with WcW..I guess I reserve the Hall for the cream of the crop and would rather vote "no" right off the bat and then be "convinced" that they should be in. Dynamite is in because he truly revolutionized the Jr division and influenced so many workers from Benoit, Lyger, Bret Hart, owen...No Dynamite and I dont think we'd see many of those names...can the same be said for Mysterio?
Aside from the Kawada match has Sasaki had anything worth watching ?
I would love to see the Midnights in and I think they will be in. The best US tag team ever ( if you consider working ability ...how long they were together...a tag team working the top spot on big shows (Superdome)...I think they should be in
Moolah will be in although I am with you on her not being in. Although she is one of those "household" names that everyone knows.
Is it Mysterio or Cena that brings in the kids...probably both
When you look at the HoF there are names that stick out - Vader being one and honestly..I think Mick Foley sticks out as well..
Post a Comment